
If Rudy Giuliani thought he
silenced Ron Paul at the FOX News debate — by displaying his own ignorance, ironically — he was sadly mistaken. The remarks may have drawn loud applause, but they were factually inaccurate and Ron Paul continues to hammer him for it. Last week Paul
gave Rudy a reading assignment starting with the 9/11 Commission report.

The warmongerererer—William "the Bloody," Kristol got a call from a White House official telling him that Bush was furious, just furious with the NY Times article that says the administration is debating whether to cut the troop levels in half in 2008.
The Bush administration is developing what are described as concepts for reducing American combat forces in
Iraq by as much as half next year, according to senior administration officials in the midst of the internal debate…
read on
Kristol was furious too. How dare anybody from the White House discuss this! A common tactic with RW hack pundits like William is to make bogus predictions, but say them in an even tone that makes their ideas sound almost plausible. He says that:
Petraeus and Odierno assume that if they can sustain the surge through the beginning of 2008, at that point, maybe there will be enough Iraqi forces that we can begin to draw-down.
Military planners have abandoned the idea that standing up Iraqi troops will enable American soldiers to start coming home soon and now believe that U.S. troops will have to defeat the insurgents and secure control of troubled provinces.
Training Iraqi troops, which had been the cornerstone of the Bush administration’s Iraq policy since 2005, has dropped in priority, officials in Baghdad and Washington said.
Kristol is a joke that's not
Joe Klein–is always wrong—helps to perpetuate a dismal foreign policy—it goes on and on—and is rewarded with a plump TIME magazine column. Think Progress
has more…
No comments:
Post a Comment